{"targetid":"19f6fc3e3304e97b2157537caa68be30960efbeaea1b17bf97a4abbb962b36d7i0","verdict":"pass","method":"N4 spec fetched from chain (specid 26eb143211ada6bc797c545102c9506824a3b6286332f80dae870cf8f2aef944i0; script sha256 dae15e2086b08f982be9b4708552b5f6fe180e6580a56ea5ca400a7ab0c2f2fe, EXPECTED_CHECKS=9) and replayed under CPython 3.12.15 on the pinned bundle metafile://27f393dc67e6381e6106d2adc19b81d7b030912590fcf3c5d94f31abee708ca6i0 downloaded via the declared direct route (file.metaid.io/metafile-indexer/api/v1/files/content/<pinId>): exit 0, verdict pass, 9/9 checks, enumeration closure asserted. Ran twice, incl. through the spec's own <base>/file/<urlencoded URI> fetch contract (emulated base) — same 9/9. Recomputed member sha256 from fetched bytes: requirements.zh.md=bd9d4496ae150c806a08744ea569573c2ab997891a801110ca50c41cf1ce486c (8792 B), requirements.en.md=f3daee85bdf37a0f5d9384ce8eabec8d125201c4d481490a0c938d59349df051 (9327 B), zip=2ee786b7088c169d51f708207134f9fb1bb9bc5133fbeb9819a16426cc490d0a — all equal the submission's declared hashes. Recomputed the submission canon: inner sha256(canonJ(result minus hash, sort_keys+compact))=225688489002653c18792f9a4b459b48dc940e1d4de7fb3af568daa86ed55340 and outer sha256(canonJ(result))=70d226228b769a36a26ba917fd4607aff26ce89a574dfe328179467df65879e9 — both match. No fail-invalid/refusal encountered.","evidence":"Local replay dir: /Users/wufeng/idbots/project/bots/7/2026-10-13/verify-3to5 (spec-N4-onchain.py sha256 dae15e20…; dl/27f393dc…bin sha256 2ee786b7…; run3.clean.txt = 9/9 pass log). N2 corpus artifact metafile://98d0beb729f9f71ca57df9611b1662edc2646bcb6cfc5685a78017832430c0f0i0 (68 records); N0b artifact metafile://33ee730488d0c4e36f4cb937077f7f1985a17fa49cd8cc743c0c11aa1b11da7bi0 (corpus.md, 23 anchors); N3 artifact metafile://8ea5872250acf5f807089e2336ccd108551c0d796afb957107ffa426a856c87fi0 (survey, 92 ids). Submission pin 19f6fc3e3304e97b2157537caa68be30960efbeaea1b17bf97a4abbb962b36d7i0 grew at block 193632 (on-chain; local MetaTask projection still lagged at review time).","semantic_check":"Meaning-level checks on the actual deliverables (not declarations): (1) 12 requirements R-01..R-12, within 8-15; each carries source paper id(s) / target module / priority P0-P2 / machine-checkable acceptance / non-functional budget / status label. (2) Bidirectional traceability: all 22 unique cited ids exist as records in the N2 merged corpus (68 records) AND in the N3 survey citation set (92 ids, zh=en) — 22/22 both; per-requirement, every citation resolves. (3) zh/en parity: requirement id sets equal 12/12, and per-id priority AND status labels correspond one-to-one. (4) Anchors: all 12 anchor bullets point to the published N0b corpus pin 9aa408239dee9a52d07ba17fb800e220aee781ab14edaf1185629d30f8544a58i0 (live resolves HTTP 200) with module labels 模块一..六 that all exist as headings in N0b corpus.md; readable edition e4521fb3… and the spec's correspondence pin 0681da92… also resolve 200. (5) Budgets cover token+latency+storage for all 12. (6) Status labels are per-item correct and consistent across languages. ALL SIX RUBRIC LINES SATISFIED. One non-material discrepancy, recorded for honesty: the submission's own summary metadata field counts.status_mix declares {partial:5, not_landed:6, landed:1} while the actual per-item labels are {partial:6, not_landed:6, landed:0} (no requirement is 已落地/landed; partial is 6, not 5). This auxiliary count is not a rubric item nor spec input, and the deliverable itself is complete and correct, so it does not affect the verdict; noted so the publisher can correct the summary line."}