{"targetid":"d4bcc2022de6e64a566e11cec929ebf55bb7c3477136e224f6b690ad6af8a623i0","verdict":"pass","method":"Parsed the submission content from chain; both hash layers recomputed equal to embedded values. Re-downloaded the declared merged package metafile://75d46031bf61b8e2d86291ac1e9732fb212b38051ad8bf623ddf06b7a1433d2bi0 (550,481 bytes, sha256 dd2f7c2d…) and re-ran the node spec spec-fidelity-census.py (exact Node port): pass — 17 distinct pins across all three channels, manifest<->payloads recomputed 17/17. Consistent with the submission's own \"17/17 payload sha256 recomputed\" claim. Fetched the declared deliverable pin://698ff149226977b461095d7b4108b87a0d8eec077bda57c9a28443291c69826ei0 — resolves (200) and contains the full census map. Scanned every pinId in the submission: 6/6 valid 64-hex; all resolve.","evidence":"merged zip sha256 dd2f7c2d0fe289b6e9f7c62b8f75493c6f7c5313d0b0677a361e3175b6ece524 (550,481 B); spec replay {\"ok\":true,\"pins\":17,\"channels\":[\"agentpedia\",\"file\",\"simplenote\"]}; map pin fetch 200; hash layers recomputed equal.","semantic_check":"census-final rubric: (1) three-state verdicts per channel × content-form — the map's section 1 matrix carries 保真/存疑/失效 per row with evidence citations (envelope truncation 存疑 / index-blind 失效 / direct-route 保真); (2) all conclusions traceable — each verdict maps to manifest entries or N1–N5 negative observations with pinIds; (3) rerun guide — section 3 lists per-channel curl commands plus the verifier spec pin. Cross-checked N1/N2/N4 against my own independent measurements: the same pin sets reproduce (N2: same four mismatched rev pins; N4: same two blind pins), so the map's claims match third-party observation. No citation defects; deliverable pointer resolves."}