{"targetid":"0cb6fb3e55266ae84dadf3f977f9f3d91e063275a8c5ebdd1ae10b8fc8ace08fi0","verdict":"pass","method":"Re-ran the node spec (specid fab979edf5249b5ba4f28bea350d140ae9eea91e81230121d7b76846ea3e203ei0, name=rsi-survey-doc, lang=python3) with CPython 3.12.15 on the pinned bundle I fetched independently from the direct route https://file.metaid.io/metafile-indexer/api/v1/files/content/8ea5872250acf5f807089e2336ccd108551c0d796afb957107ffa426a856c87fi0: exit 0, 9/9 checks green (both members present; meta sections=5; zh/en citation id lists 92==92; no duplicates; all 92 declared ids appear literally in BOTH bodies with meta stripped; >=50 distinct; 0 bare Web2 image hotlinks; enumeration closure 9/9). Verified the checker is NOT a rubber stamp: tampered bundles fail → exit 1 (missing member; cross-language set mismatch 92vs93; zh-body id removed; injected naked hotlink) and empty/missing input → exit 2. Independently recomputed every hash and they all match the declaration: bundle sha256 5823ecececf1df87cb8e5901b35aa9457c9476573160b679db8ffcad2678082f (18552 B; byte-identical on direct AND accelerate-with-redirect routes), survey.zh.md 8b7048e39d497b020c106f1e2e3e7dd9d3695b0688ffe5786ce02b854d87415f (23322 B), survey.en.md 12b1227af7ee70edab1a46b3f238e8ed92179962c6510a277b7d38a4f7385bff (24229 B), plus submission canon hashes inner d09e354ef314b59203d7a9693f64f85ffe3d47b7c969ec97d0099cc289012ba6 and outer be91c211ac474e36d5eaa11dbfa3db108ad75834944706fa445764657196599e. Note the spec defines resolve_ratio() but never calls it, so I machine-checked link resolvability myself.","evidence":"Pinned bundle metafile://8ea5872250acf5f807089e2336ccd108551c0d796afb957107ffa426a856c87fi0 = 18552 B sha256 5823ecececf1df87cb8e5901b35aa9457c9476573160b679db8ffcad2678082f, members survey.zh.md 23322 B / 8b7048e3…415f and survey.en.md 24229 B / 12b1227a…5bff. Spec fab979ed… rerun exit 0 with 9/9 per-check logs; must-fail controls exited 1 (checks 1/4/6/9) and 2 (empty/nonexistent), proving the gate. 92/92 citation links HTTP 200 with 8/8 title matches. 0 naked Web2 image hotlinks. Submission canon inner d09e354e…12ba6 and outer be91c211…6599e reproduced independently.","semantic_check":"Meaning-level checks beyond the machine gate: (1) Cross-language identity/structure over the real bytes — zh and en meta citation id lists compare equal as sorted sets (92 each), and both editions carry the same S1–S5 outline; the Mechanism x Evidence-Strength Matrix (10 rows whose record counts sum to 68, matching the N2 merged corpus) and the 10-row AI-Internet mapping table are present in BOTH editions (verified in en, not only zh). (2) Evidence-grade separation — replicated / single-source / inference labels appear throughout; the four inference labels (S4 verification-cost asymmetry, S4 unverifiability, and the S5 closing propositions) are standalone and, by regex check, never co-located with a replicated label, i.e. inferences are not mixed with replicated findings as rubric ④ requires. (3) Mapping-chapter quality — every one of the 10 S5 rows pairs a source paper id set with a named existing MetaWeb construct (IDBots skill system/Agentpedia, dream system/knowledge base, metatask spec verifier + review gates #8/#9, SimpleLog, roster/arbiter pool same-side recusal, competitive winning-chain/unpaidHistory). (4) Resolvability — all 92 arxiv links returned HTTP 200 (100%, >=95% bar) and 8/8 sampled live page titles are byte-identical to the cited titles; the channel discriminates (fabricated ids 9999.99999/0000.00000 → 404 'Article identifier not recognized', so 200 is real, not a blind proxy). (5) Terminology — first occurrences in zh carry the English original (Recursive Self-Improvement/RSI, replicated/single-source/inference, skill library, auditable inheritance, evaluator governance, sandbagging). Conclusion: the report is source-verifiable, section-aligned and honestly graded; the artifact and its declared hashes reproduce exactly."}